Beers With Our Founding Fathers
  • Free
  • Introduction
  • Order
  • Blog - Author Thoughts
  • Book Excerpts and Chapter Previews
    • Exerpts and Quotes
    • Table of Contents
    • Loss of Direction
    • Bill of Rights
    • Second Amendment
    • Tunnel Intellligence
  • Join the NRA!
  • Contact Info
  • Media Copies
  • Founding Documents
  • Facebook
  • Speaking Engagements

What Did Director Comey Really Tell Us?

7/6/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
What Did Director Comey Really Tell Us?
Yesterday we all saw, or heard, the breaking news of FBI Director Comey’s detailed press conference and text of the press release.  That is the key – detailed.  As a legal investigator for a living of nearly 30 years, I review and dissect statements daily – because the facts are in the details.  What most people heard was ‘no charges’; more accurately it was no recommendation of charges, but I’ll get to that.

You can read my minimal comments and the relevant text, exactly quoted, of Director Comey’s speech here - www.beerswithourfoundingfathers.com/blog---author-thoughts/unfit-to-run-for-or-be-president.  I also detailed three specific quotes:

 - "There is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

- "There is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information."

- My favorite, "This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. Those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."

 However, the most important quotes are these, which are not in my emotional response:

- “…the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision.”

- This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways.

       -- First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest.
        -- Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.

Then Director Comey went on the lay the case out before the American people in a public forum in which he could not be stopped or censored.  He continued, with every listener expecting him to close with recommending her indictment.  He did not – and it left everyone stunned; from supporters to opponents.  Who was not stunned were those that all variously met in the week leading up to this press conference.
Why would Director Comey do this?  First, he knew there would be no charges – because the Attorney General had said, only a few days before, that she “fully expects to accept the recommendations” of the FBI investigations.  He responded to her wiggle room with his own – here is the case of the FBI, which you do not want us to report; and here is the recommendation you wanted.  I do not think he was ordered to; pressured yes.  What do the above details mean?
“…the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision.”
I am a published author and recognized expert in the process of private investigations.  One of my mantra’s is to COMPLETE the investigation, not just conduct.  He was clearly telling the American people the investigation was not complete.  The timeline he was under left him no ability to announced any conclusions after completing the investigation.  The president was leaving that morning with the subject of the investigation to campaign – and she needed ‘cleared’ first.
He concluded this statement by making it clear that he was tossing the ball into the AG’s court.
- This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. In other words, get ready and take careful notes.
          -- First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest.
Again, get ready and take careful notes – I’m about to tell you things you would not otherwise hear.  I am about to tell the American people that they have an important decision to make and the information I am going to detail should help in that decision.
     -- Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say. Due to circumstances beyond my control, and undue pressure, I am about to throw myself under the bus – but I am at least going to do all I can to keep control of the circumstances.  I may have been pressured to announce a pre-determined outcome, but I will not be pressured into lying to the American people.
Director Comey then laid out the full case against Hillary Clinton for the American people to indict her at the voting booth.  He risked his career to protect his future, and exposed the administration and the Clintons for who they all are – a criminal enterprise that intends to be above the law.  As I wrote in 2013 – the RICO Administration (Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization) at www.beerswithourfoundingfathers.com/blog---author-thoughts/the-rico-administration.

0 Comments

Unfit to Run For or Be President

7/5/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
This is hot off the press after the announcement of FBI Director Comey to not recommend charges against democratic presidential candidate, and former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.

This is not about guilt or innocence, as a legal investigator professionally, that is a concern.  This is about the appearance of impropriety and founded acts unfit for a Secretary of State or President.

- Thursday 06/09/2016 - President Obama announces formal endorsement of Hillary Clinton.

- Monday 06/27/2016 - Bill Clinton just happened to learn the AG was on the AZ tarmac and waited so he could spontaneously board her government plane and chat about grandkids for 30 minutes.  She happened to divert from a trip to Aspen to Arizona. The AG and her staff in advance knew there was possibility of impropriety by either or both.

- Friday 07/01/2016 - AG announced meeting may have been inappropriate and would not interfere with the ongoing FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton.  She stated, she 'fully expects to accept the recommendations'.

- Sunday 07/02/2016 - Multiple FBI agents meet Hillary Clinton at her home (not nearby FBI headquarters or any other FBI office) and interview her for over three hours.

- Tuesday 07/05/2016 - it is announced that President Obama will be campaigning with Hillary Clinton and she will be flying on Air Force One.

- Tuesday 07/05/2016 - FBI Director Comey announces a litany of violations found in the investigation (below) and recommends to the Department of Justice that no charges be filed.

He may not have recommended criminal charges; however, he did lay out a clear list of violations which clearly show she is unfit to run for or be our president - and should have been charged with.

Quoted directly from FBI Director Comey, nothing added and only reduced down to the key details:
(the full text is here - www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b.-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clintons-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
  • FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.
    • Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.
    • As new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and decommissioned in various ways.
      • When one of Secretary Clinton’s original personal servers was decommissioned in 2013, the e-mail software was removed.
    • From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department:
      • 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received.
      • Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent
      • 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information
      • Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential
    • The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.
      • Three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received
      • One at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level.
    • Found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.
    • It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.
 
  • Did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information
  • There is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
    • Seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received.
  • There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.
    • Information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
    • None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning.
    • Even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
  • Hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account.
  • Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.
  • It is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
 
  • There is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information
  • This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. Those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.
The indictment Hilly needs is from the American voters - no vote for her. There cannot be a stronger indictment.
Three key quotes from this statement...
"There is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."
"There is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information."
My favorite, "This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. Those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions." - YOU would be that person charged.


0 Comments

    Author

    Dean A. Beers is an American Patriot and welcomes all fellow Patriots.

    Archives

    July 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    February 2016
    November 2014
    October 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Direct email - admin@BeersWithOurFoundingFathers.com
What America do YOU want to live in?